Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 03:19
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
8 Signs You Should See a Cardiologist, According to Doctors - EatingWell
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Thank you.
Does the West have a defense against China's PL17 air-air missile?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Google's Find Hub finally gets AirTag-like UWB precision finding - Android Police
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Here's What To Expect From A New COVID Variant Going Around - BuzzFeed
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Switzerland proposes forcing UBS to add $26bn in capital - Financial Times